The Evolution of Theory of Mind Abilities: How Rhesus Monkeys Reason
About The Minds of Others
One of the hallmarks of human psychology is our species' ability to
reason about the minds of other individuals, a capacity commonly
referred to as a theory of mind (ToM). Although developmental studies
have revealed much about ontogeny of our ToM abilities, to date, there
is still much controversy concerning the evolution of these capacities
and their emergence in non-human primates. Do other primates reason
about the minds of other individuals? We present the results of several
studies using non-verbal theory of mind (ToM) tasks to explore what
rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) know about the minds of human
competitors in the absence of training. To date, studies of ToM in this
species suggest that although rhesus monkeys follow the gaze of human
experimenters, they seem to know little about the significance of eyes.
Here, however, we present rhesus monkeys with a different
kind of non-verbal ToM task, one that involves reasoning about mental
states in a competitive rather than cooperative situation. These
studies build on work by Hare, Call, and Tomasello using similar
competitive tasks with chimpanzees. In our studies, monkeys received a
single trial in which they could attempt to obtain one of two grapes,
each of which were guarded by a human experimenter. The experimenters
differed only in the way they oriented towards the contested grapes.
Monkeys preferentially approached an experimenter who was facing away
from the grape, whose head and eyes were facing away from the grape,
and whose eyes alone were facing away from the grape. These results
suggest that, like chimpanzees, rhesus monkeys prefer competing with
humans who are unable to see contested foods. We then tested whether
or not subjects understood that barriers could also influence
competitors’ visual access. Monkeys selectively approached an
experimenter whose line of sight was blocked by a barrier over an
experimenter holding a barrier that did not block visual access. In
the final studies, we investigated whether monkeys reason about the
knowledge states of human experimenters. Taken together, these results
from competitive tasks suggest that rhesus monkeys understand more
about the minds of others than previously thought. Specifically,
these results suggest that at least one monkey species understands what
competitors do and do not know.